Shared cycling playing capital, through continuous investment to expand to eat, to imitate drops away to dominate the market of the industry, but low income share a bicycle, and not just for goods, this kind of imitation method hasn't Shared cycling a bright future, to share in all predicting a bike can't become the next drops, and sure enough, the not mature industry, has been on the road to terminate.
Shanghai a regulation, three years of mandatory scrapping is a start
Shared bike for personal share of bicycle is reduced, at the same time increase the utilization rate of each car, maximize resource utilization, which means that the Shared cycling utilization rate is higher than personal usage of bicycle, it also represents its consumption rate is also high, Shanghai bike three years must be mandatory scrapping rules for sharing, in make Shared cycling experience more rods at the same time, is also trying to reduce the occurrence of accidents.
in addition to the provisions of Shared cycling will be forced to scrap, 3 years after the policy also specifies the scrap car, not by reassembling or repaired back into the market, this greatly reduced the trouble back at home of people, but it also drew the Shared bike to earn money in a grey area, and stated the spending is must spend.
in addition to spending in the car, in order to be able to let users at ease to use, the policy also rules, Shared cycling customer service need 24 hours to be able to get in touch, and in view of the user questions, within 48 hours is processing as a result, it not only means to share bicycle to take responsibility to the customer, also means that this is a huge spending, this policy allows the Shared cycling had to strengthen up the weak part.
at the same time, Shanghai has introduced more than 12 years old, height between 1.45 to 1.95 m people to the car, and then for the elderly is no age limit, the purpose of this policy is to control also Shared a bike accident rate, convenient for others to share bikes at the same time, also can not to cause trouble to the society.
these policy in Shanghai is just a start, the question not so much for sharing a bicycle, there are forcibly removed parts, forced to share the bicycle with private locks and other issues are not addressed in this policy, so these for people to use Shared cycling safety issues, yet is just a beginning.
new rules: nanjing network about car sharing bike real-name
based on the policies of Shanghai, nanjing, also more concerned about their own districts, share the emergence of the bike is really convenient for many people, because the city's share bikes parked all lane will be scattered, not can meet a walk a few steps, this kind of public parking is convenient for the management of the city becomes difficult, so the nanjing proposed share the bicycle to the system requirements, if there are people intentionally damage or theft Shared cycling or violated traffic regulations, illegal parking, will have relevant departments to knock on your door, and deduct your XinYuZhi.
so the question comes, what's the use of Shared cycling XinYuZhi?Difficult to also can because of Shared cycling XinYuZhi is too low and if the case constitutes a crime?So after the real-name system, Shared cycling XinYuZhi how low can alert others?First Shared cycling itself is not just the icing on the cake for goods, I might have to add money to ride XinYuZhi is too low, 1, 2 dollars price actually to a person what no threat, if is for a period of time I can't ride a bike, also won't affect life, but in any case, the injured are sharing a bike.
in addition to solve Shared cycling, the trouble brought convenience to the city of nanjing also stipulates the Shared bicycle to park to orderly, modes, to the nanjing urban management bureau had drawn to some small white green at the end of the pure and fresh and parking space, the convenience of city management, also let Shared a bike more orderly, but it was killed the Shared cycling a growth of the capital - is convenient, in this case, the convenience is everywhere, this policy the Shared bicycle parking Spaces, and we go to the mall to park your car in the outside be miles, and what's the difference?
Shanghai and nanjing regulations for Shared cycling, in addition to improve the experience, the larger is the fatal blow.
profit is low, so a toss about the lost money
share of single source of income is the fare for a dollar an hour, and then calculate some what, if anything, those who can be the withdrawal of the deposit at any time, plus the cost of the car itself, actually share the bike is very little profit, now in Shanghai for three years the provisions of the mandatory scrapping Shared cycling every car can be discarded, soon back to this and three years, before being forced to scrap, there will be many car was damaged by artificial, this is a not small cost, and the bike itself is very fragile, if other cities because once appear quality problem caused by accidents, believe that mandatory scrapping 3 years is more than just the policy of Shanghai.
the presence of the customer service is a big spending, 24 hours online all day, you'll also have to be able to solve the problems of the users, the spending is also serious, this let I will be very little profit sharing bike how live, each a bicycle now the task is not only to earn back their capital cost and employee wages, now also need to earn a big wave of the salary of customer service, so do bottom go to, probably 3 years scrap of that day of, the bike could not retire.
meat dumplings dozen dog's capital, this bubble feast whether the end
from appearing to now, share the bike cost of inputs is very big, everyone is constantly to throw money to occupy the market, large companies throw money eat, small companies throw money waiting to be eat, these are on the road is difficult to turn back, because spent too much, only crustily skin of head to fight, according to now, these inputs can be hard to return, once he's has a policy to share a bike all aspects of development must be in accordance with the relevant provisions to handle affairs, provision can not if you earn money.
in the present case, sharing the economy may be more suitable for do a theory, practice, share the economy is difficult to have a good end, an owner of the room was beyond recognition, Shared cycling was hung on a tree, is still in the lake, the national quality average also can't ride sharing economy the need to be able to self bondage, but Shared cycling (don't bump south wall does not return, cars were destroyed every day, every day there are a lot of money to pick up yesterday, and now policy control, don't know if Shared cycling money also can fill in as much hole.
pay attention to the public, the heart of the rock, reply "developer", see "after vanke, developers make 90 childlessness"