at a congressional hearing in Washington, the President proposed trump the fence along the border of new problems.
the interior minister Zinke in testimony: "boundary is very complicated, if you want to build physical walls, the wall on which side do you want? We're not going to put it on our land, and give the forms to Mexico. We may not take the wall" in the river.
if the original intention, of course, it can be built in the middle of the river wall.In most parts of Texas border, the river is quite shallow.But, in general on the ground to build the wall is more reasonable, and ideally should be in the land will not be overwhelmed with an overflowing river.
so the ministry of the interior in the suggestion on the Mexican side of the river built walls, because the United States "will not to give up the territory's neighbors to the south".It says like the United States has a lot of land to Mexico.
in order to build the wall, the federal government needs to be in the United States have large tracts of land were imposed on behalf of, but may not agree with some land owners, especially the border residents of many Democrats, natural, won't make government trump contentment.So, choose the building wall in Mexico territory is to avoid to stimulate the land owners.
however, this will stimulate to Mexico.
has been promising to trump the Mexican government pay wall is unrealistic.And as President, he did not pay any plans to Mexico.He now to persuade a foreign government to allow the United States to build the wall on their territory, the territorial sovereignty complete "play rascal" is almost unlikely.In theory, can cut off aid to the country's trump and "wall" pay "grants to Mexico, but basically there is no way to make Mexico trump built a wall to abandon territory.
the interior minister's overall view is right: building wall balance involves a lot of problems, and now can't see the trump has the ability to solve the problem.